Gero Jenner – Seite 2

Democracy – a reversibel Progress

Excerpt from my book “One World! – Why the rise and fall of Great Powers musst come to an end” published in German but not yet available in English.

Whereas democracies assume that everyone is fallible, in totalitarian regimes the fundamental assumption is that the ruling party or the supreme leader is always right. Harari

What defines a system as ‘democratic’ is only that its centre doesn’t have unlimited authority and that the system possesses robust mechanisms to correct the centre’s mistakes. Harari

The sciences of nature are fundamentally accessible to all humans. Knowledge is not inherited; it must be acquired through individual effort. In this regard, science and enlightenment were inherently democratic from the beginning. However, democracy as a political form of governance does not necessarily arise from the demands of enlightenment. If knowledge and skills are to replace privileges, we may well argue that the leadership of the state should be in no other hands than those of educated experts. Given this premise, it is by no means surprising that leading figures of the European Enlightenment, such as Montesquieu, Locke, Voltaire, Hume, Rousseau, or Kant, widely differed as to their opinions on this matter. For instance Rousseau: his “volonté générale” was never more than an intellectual construct, only to be found in the real world when the masses are incited by demagogues. And let’s not forget: more than two thousand years earlier, none other than Plato had expressed the opinion that the governance of a state should be in the hands of the knowledgeable — the philosophers as he called them. In doing so, he was inspired by Sparta, a military dictatorship.

The Sciences (of Nature) can only be true if their Premises are wrong

Science fulfills an existential purpose. It serves to help us find our way by recognizing regularity – and hence predictability – in the events surrounding us. The need for such regularity and predictability dominates us to such a degree that we even invent it when we cannot discern it within the things themselves. People in earlier times believed that spirits and gods caused volcanoes to erupt, and droughts or diseases to occur, or that sacrifices and prayers could persuade them to avert such evils. That is, they invented a fictious causality being unable to recognize true causes. The objectively existing order of nature was understood only to the extent that was essential for the survival of the species: hunting animals or growing plants required a careful understanding of existing natural laws. Only since the Enlightenment und subsequent Industrial Revolution did humanity move beyond this elementary stage, but then this happened at a very rapid pace. Science is now capable of artificially creating new life forms in the laboratory and fundamentally altering existing ones with the help of genetic manipulation. Human voyages to distant planets, which were previously only conjured up in fairy tales and myths, have turned into a real possibilities.

Die Wissenschaften (der Natur) sind nur wahr, wenn ihre Voraussetzungen falsch sind

Wissenschaft erfüllt einen existenziellen Zweck. Sie dient dazu, uns in der Welt zurechtzufinden, indem sie die Berechenbarkeit – das Regelmaß – in den uns umgebenden Geschehnissen erkennt. Das Bedürfnis nach solchem Regelmaß und solcher Berechenbarkeit beherrscht uns so sehr, dass wir es sogar frei erfinden, wenn wir es aus den Dingen selbst nicht ablesen können. Menschen früherer Zeiten glaubten, dass Geister und Götter Vulkane ausbrechen ließen, Dürren oder Krankheiten verursachten oder dass man sie durch Opfer und Gebete dazu bewegen konnte, solche Übel auch wieder abzuwenden. Das war erfundene Kausalität. Früher wusste man vergleichsweise wenig von den objektiv bestehenden Ordnungen der der Natur. Diese wurden gerade so weit durchschaut, wie das für das Überleben der Art unerlässlich war. Wie man Tiere erbeutet oder Pflanzen züchtet, bedurfte der sorgfältigen Erkenntnis bestehender Naturgesetze. Über dieses elementare Stadium ist die Menschheit erst seit der Industriellen Revolution, dann aber in stetig beschleunigtem Tempo hinausgelangt. Inzwischen ist Wissenschaft in der Lage, neue Lebewesen im Labor künstlich herzustellen und bestehende mit Hilfe genetischer Manipulation grundlegend zu verändern. Ausflüge des Menschen zu fernen Planeten, die vordem allenfalls in Märchen und Mythen beschworen wurden, gehören heute zu den realen Optionen.

Blaming Germanists

Around the beginning of the last century, in 1909, when German science could still boast a world-class reputation, the great American William James expressed himself in a rather unflattering way about the German professor in a lecture titled „A Pluralistic Universe“:

“In Germany the forms are so professionalized that anybody who has gained a teaching chair and written a book, however distorted and eccentric, has the legal right to figure forever in the history of the subject like a fly in amber. All later comers have the duty of quoting him and measuring their opinions with his opinion. Such are the rules of the professorial game – they think and write from each other and for each other and at each other exclusively” (my emphasis).

Germanistenschelte

Gegen Anfang des vergangenen Jahrhunderts, im Jahre 1909, als deutsche Wissenschaft sich noch ihres Weltrufs rühmen durfte, äußerte sich William James, der große Amerikaner, in einer Vorlesung mit dem Titel „A pluralistic Universe“ auf folgende wenig schmeichelhafte Art über den deutschen Professor:
“In Germany the forms are so professionalized that anybody who has gained a teaching chair and written a book, however distorted and eccentric, has the legal right to figure forever in the history of the subject like a fly in amber. All later comers have the duty of quoting him and measuring their opinions with his opinion. Such are the rules of the professorial game – they think and write from each other and for each other and at each other exclusively” (meine Hervorh.). Germanistenschelte weiterlesen

One! World – Critique of Populist Irrationality

As human beings, we strive for self-determination – freedom is the word that sums up this aspiration. Uniformity, blending into the crowd, indistinguishability, dependence on others – these are the terms that describe the opposite of personal freedom and independence. Anyone who wants to make us all the same is met with fundamental outrage; they want to violate our basic human rights.

Eine! Welt – Kritik der populistischen Unvernunft

Als Menschen streben wir nach Selbstbestimmung – Freiheit ist das Wort, womit dieses Bestreben auf den Begriff gebracht wird. Uniformität, Aufgehen in der Masse, Ununterscheidbarkeit, Abhängigkeit von anderen – das sind die Begriffe, die den Gegensatz zur persönlichen Freiheit und Unabhängigkeit beschreiben. Wer uns gleichmachen will, der stößt auf elementare Empörung, der will uns in unseren elementaren Menschenrechten verletzen.

The Excursion to Kawabata

A fine mist hovers over the water, its vapours occasionally blurring the outlines of the mountains. Yet it is the heads that dominate the foreground, bobbing in the warm — sometimes even scalding — mountain lake of Kawabata, which the locals call an Onsen, a hot spring. But the water is of no concern to us, nor are the jagged peaks encircling it, which the effusive travel brochure simply labels „enchanting.“ No, what captivates our attention are the disembodied heads protruding above the steaming surface of the lake, the spirit hovering over the waters. Seven heads — true giants of their era, the greatest minds to grace the species that then inhabited the globe.

Der Ausflug nach Kawabata

Ein feiner Nebel schwebt über dem Wasser, manchmal lassen seine Schwaden die Umrisse der Berge verschwimmen. Es sind die Köpfe, die den Vordergrund bilden, hier im warmen, stellenweise sogar heißen Gebirgssee von Kawabata, den die Einheimischen „Onsen“ nennen, d.h. warme Quelle. Aber das Wasser geht uns nichts an, auch nicht die umliegenden vielfach gezackten Berge, welche der sie lobende Reiseprospekt schlicht mit dem Prädikat „bezaubernd“ versieht. Es sind die eben über die dampfende Oberfläche des Sees hinausragenden rumpflosen Köpfe, es ist der über den Wassern schwebende Geist, der unsere Aufmerksamkeit bannt. Der Ausflug nach Kawabata weiterlesen

Lasst sie Wonnewabern!

Es scheint höchste Zeit, dem Begriff des Wonnewaberns und seinen verderblichen Auswirkungen besondere Aufmerksamkeit zu widmen, zumal er zwar auf Anhieb verständlich, in seinem innersten Wesen aber dennoch höchst rätselhaft ist. Jedermann weiß, was er unter Wonne verstehen soll. Mancher würde auch schlicht von Entzücken sprechen. Selbst der gedrückteste Mensch kennt Momente, wo sein Ich sich in einem Zustand der vorübergehenden Ekstase, eben der Wonne oder des Entzückens befindet. Nicht unbedingt muss mit solchen Momenten aber ein Wabern verknüpft sein – ist dies aber der Fall, wie nachgewiesenermaßen beim Motus extatico-narcissicus trumpiensis – dann haben wir es möglicherweise mit einer welthistorischen Erscheinung zu tun. Das ist der Grund, warum in unserer Zeit kein politisch denkender Mensch an dem Phänomen des Wonnewaberns vorüberkommt, selbst und gerade auch die Wissenschaft nicht, die sich bereits auf die ihr eigene systematische Art damit befasst und uns in diesem Sinne den soeben genannten Fachbegriff bereitgestellt hat.

The Candidate

It seems a matter of urgent concern to devote particular attention to the notion of rapturous quivering and its pernicious effects, for while at first glance it is immediately comprehensible, its innermost essence remains profoundly enigmatic. Everyone knows what is meant by rapture. Some might simply call it delight. Even the most downtrodden soul experiences moments when the self is suspended in a state of fleeting ecstasy — precisely that of rapture or delight. Yet such moments need not necessarily be accompanied by a quiver — but when they are, as demonstrably occurs in theMotus extatico-narcissicus trumpiensis, we may well be witnessing a phenomenon of world-historical significance. This is why at the present age no politically minded individual can ignore the spectacle of ecstatic quivering, least of all the scientific community, which has already engaged with it in its characteristically systematic manner, bestowing upon us the aforementioned technical term.

Traps for men and mosquitos

I confess, I initially found Gesine K.—that now infamous figure, celebrated by some and reviled by others—rather agreeable, at least in terms of her undeniably striking physical allure. After all, she possesses all the requisite qualities to exert a magnetic pull upon men that notoriously susceptible breed, so easily swayed by superficial charms. Her bosom is of an expansive, alluring proportion; her hair, a radiant platinum blonde, announces her presence from afar; and her bright, ringing laughter—though admittedly tinged with mockery—poses a formidable challenge to any red-blooded representative of our tragically vulnerable, if not downright feeble, sex.